В Италии выставили на продажу сотни домов за один евро

Опубликовано

В Италии выставили на продажу сотни домов за один евроФото: ChrisO / Wikimedia

На юге Сицилии в городе Муссомели местные власти выставили на продажу около сотни ветхих домов, стоимость каждого — один евро. Об этом сообщает The Sun.

Будущим владельцам было выдвинуто условие — в течение года они обязаны провести капитальный ремонт в купленном доме, который обойдется им примерно в 95 евро (около семи тысяч рублей) за квадратный метр, пишет издание. В противном случае собственник потеряет внесенный гарантийный депозит в размере около семи тысяч евро (более 512 тысяч рублей).

Городские власти заявили, что готовы предоставить помощь архитекторов и инженеров. Ожидается, что в ближайшее время появятся еще 400 предложений.

В январе власти итальянского муниципалитета Самбука-ди-Сицилия объявили распродажу домов за один евро. На продажу были выставлены десятки исторических объектов с целью привлечь в город, страдающий от депопуляции, новых жителей и улучшить его облик. Покупателей обязали отремонтировать дома в течение трех лет, потратив на работы не менее 15 тысяч евро (около 1,1 миллиона рублей).


1

Комментарий

  1. All too often the «bean counters» are generally telling us how we tend to be falling short.
    They come up with many scheme to get us to find out more patients
    than we can easily reasonably see or tips on how to «create» more procedures than are called
    for. This is bottom-line or practice-centered medicine and my opinion is unethical in addition to immoral.

    It is also outside of whatever you are called to do and is needless and counter
    to a healthful practice. What I believe creates a healthy practice and is basically at the heart of doing what is suitable for patients,
    is the patient-centered consult. This type of consult is designed to be able to the root of
    the patient’s troubles and do all one can do to help them achieve their into the
    aesthetic goals.

    In this involving population-based medicine we
    have all recently been told to do the minimum, but that doesn’t change the simple fact that our
    patients are concerned along with optimal health and results.
    Olympic athletes do not win their particular contests by training towards the minimum nor will all of our patients be served by providing the minimum.

    Let’s look at an example of how population-based drugs is creeping into the
    quiz room in a way that is not totally understood by physicians
    yet has great impact on the (many similar
    examples are visible in medicine today):

    The drug businesses tell us that Plavix is around
    30% better than aspirin. Them not tell us is that it is actually comparatively 30% better.
    In definite terms it is about 1% better.
    What does this mean? Well, within a study on CVA the actual relative
    risk reduction has been quoted as 25% nevertheless the absolute reduction was
    0. 9 for ASA against 1 . 2 for Plavix or about 0. 3% (1).
    Now Plavix prices $5. 00 per product and ASA is about $0.

    05 so to the individual with a fixed income is the absolute
    difference of 0. 3% worth $4. 95 per day?
    Maybe, maybe not depending on several factors. Certainly it may be worth the
    cost to society but contemporary society is not paying the bill…
    the individual on a fixed income is usually.
    This is the confusion between people based and individual medication. Some have even endorsed taxing or eliminating Cosmetic procedures to reduce overall health charges in the US.
    This may help a few number followed by economists but is it serving the individual that is interested
    in a specific goal?

    Just what exactly is the patient-centered consult? Drugs is complex and in specific, Aesthetic Medicine is complex, yet it has been reduced to
    help sound bites on TV. Commercials ask the question «Is it better than Botox? » or «Is it superior to a Medical Peel? very well yet they do not give the reply or any real helpful information. Individuals have, in general, no natural idea of what can and should not be done for them. The patient-centered consult is an educational practical experience for the patient that helps these people understand what is realistic and what is not.

    It starts having gaining a detailed understanding of the particular patient’s concerns are, not what treatments they are serious about. Most aesthetic patients also come in thinking they know what they want. As an example many think they want an upper lid blepharoplasty but what they really need is often a brow lift. Other come in asking about fillers but really need Botox or the other way round. The understanding of what they are focused on is found not by asking what they are interested in but rather, what their concerns are. We all start in a conversational manner. Most often a patient will start by saying something like «I assume I need Botox
    right here. very well My answer is generally something similar to,
    «Well, that is certainly something we are able to do, but what is it that produces you want Botox? » Another several questions are provided
    to helping the patient target the genuine issues
    behind the issues such as texture, tone, firmness, wrinkles, poor size,
    quantity etc .

    I use a seek the advice of tool I call the $10, 000 mirror.
    We are a simple hand mirror that has no magnification on one edge and 3 to 5 times
    magnifying on the other. I hand the idea to the
    patient with the amplified side facing them. Often the interesting
    thing is that most people when given the reflect will start looking very intently at themselves and even start picking and brushing with things on their face.
    Then i have a checklist of items We ask them
    about. We go through the checklist item by item
    and discuss its affect the overall appearance of the confront.

    Once this is completed, My spouse and i formulate a
    plan of all you can apply for them, that will include issues I can do but also
    things others may be able to do. For example, I do not do face lifts, but if the result they can be
    after is best served by way of a face-lift, I put that on the
    plan. It is rare that we don’t do most of what they will benefit from.

Оставить Комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Этот сайт использует Akismet для борьбы со спамом. Узнайте как обрабатываются ваши данные комментариев.